In case, you are associated with legacy code, then you are about to get in touch with technical debt. These codes are asked to tame the current existing debt, and further help you to enable team for focusing on the fun stuff associated with new feature development. Sometimes, product managers and developers might disagree regarding constituting technical debt. In a layman term, you can state that technical debt is somewhat stated as difference between what has already been promised and what was actually delivered. The gap in between will incur interest rates on technical debt. That way, you can handle the case with ease. This kind of service even includes technical shortcuts, used for meeting the delivery deadlines.
Get rid of temptation
The development side always has this temptation to characterize the current architectural work as the current technical debt. It might work, or cannot even work, depending solely on the present nature of change. Meanwhile, product management often feels more urgent to build new features than taking time and fixing bugs or going for slow performance. Everyone needs to be aware of the distinction between technical debt related services, to avoid becoming jaded about other section’s opinions. For that, experts are asked to click here and learn more about the services, to go over here.
Learning about other notes
Apart from the distinction between technical debt, people also need to be aware of the real meaning behind new features and some more on the desired architectural changes in code base. It is mandatory to enhance clear-cut communication between the product management team and the development team. It helps I prioritizing the backlog, fix bugs and even evolve the current code base. There are loads of interesting features, to be added over here. You always have to prioritize the current technical debt in chosen sprint planning, which can work like any normal feature. You should not hide it under any separate or lonely issue tracker or backlog.
Get rid of tasks and testing spirits
You always have to fight the urge of compromising the definition by adding another separate testing task to the original story. It is too easy to defer the task and invite technical debt if the chosen points are not handled well enough. If you cannot work on testing as part of original work or cannot get the bug fixed, then the story or the bug is not done. You have to maintain a proper decorum and strict code definition for the program. This might even complete the automatic testing procedure. Nothing can work best than manual testing or buggy code base.
Working with the experts
It is mandatory to work with experts, whenever you are dealing with technical debt. However, it is always important to have a direct chat with them, if you do not want to go for any negative result. Technical debt maintenance relies mostly on the current bug fixing status. So, make sure to keep your mind sharp, and dedicate some time for bug fixing, even if that give rise to slow connecting programs for a change!